top of page

The Truth About Speaking in Tongues: Exposing the Biblical Fallacies Behind Modern Glossolalia

  • Writer: So Am I Books
    So Am I Books
  • Jul 20
  • 4 min read
Flags waving against a clear blue sky, including black-yellow stripes, Japan's red circle, a blue flag with a red cross, and more.

Introduction

Speaking in tongues, also called glossolalia, has become one of the most recognizable—and controversial—phenomena in contemporary Christianity. Popularized especially by Pentecostal and Charismatic movements in the 20th and 21st centuries, tongues are often presented as the ultimate sign of spiritual baptism or divine favor. To many believers, the ability to “speak in tongues” is a proof of being filled with the Holy Spirit or a necessary step toward deeper spiritual power.

Yet, a thorough examination of Scripture reveals a far different picture—one that exposes modern glossolalia as largely a counterfeit phenomenon, rife with theological errors and spiritual deception. Many who advocate tongues today misunderstand or outright ignore the biblical context and restrictions surrounding this gift. Others use tongues as a tool of emotionalism or control within churches. This post seeks to cut through the confusion by clarifying what the Bible truly teaches about tongues, identifying the fallacies in modern practices, and calling believers to discernment grounded in the Word of God.


What Does the Bible Really Say About Speaking in Tongues?

The phenomenon of speaking in tongues appears primarily in three New Testament sections: the Book of Acts, and chapters 12 through 14 of First Corinthians.


1. The Event of Pentecost (Acts 2)

The very first record of tongues is on the Day of Pentecost, when the apostles were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues (languages):

Acts 2:4 — "And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enabled them."

Here, the “tongues” were actual human languages spoken so that the diverse crowd of Jews from different nations could hear the gospel in their own native languages (Acts 2:6-11). This was a miraculous sign meant to authenticate the apostles’ message and confirm God’s presence in the birth of the Church.

The tongues in Acts 2 were not gibberish, ecstatic utterances, or unknown “angelic” languages; they were real, recognizable human dialects to communicate truth.


2. Paul’s Teaching on Tongues (1 Corinthians 12-14)

The Apostle Paul addresses tongues extensively in his letters to the Corinthian church, where the gift had become misused and misunderstood. His key points include:

  • Tongues are one of many spiritual gifts. Paul lists tongues alongside prophecy, healing, wisdom, knowledge, and others (1 Cor 12:10, 28).

  • Tongues primarily serve to edify the individual speaker if used privately.

“Anyone who speaks in a tongue edifies themselves…” (1 Cor 14:4)
  • In corporate worship, tongues must be interpreted or cease.

“If anyone speaks in a tongue, two—or at the most three—should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret.” (1 Cor 14:27)Without interpretation, tongues create confusion, which God forbids (1 Cor 14:33).
  • Prophecy is preferred over tongues for church edification.

“I would rather speak five intelligible words to instruct others than ten thousand words in a tongue.” (1 Cor 14:19)
  • Tongues are not a sign for believers but for unbelievers.

“Tongues, then, are a sign, not for believers but for unbelievers…” (1 Cor 14:22)This refers to the miraculous use of tongues as real foreign languages, like at Pentecost.

Paul’s detailed teaching makes it clear that tongues were never meant to be a chaotic, emotional, unintelligible experience in the public assembly without interpretation.


Common Fallacies Behind Modern Speaking in Tongues


1. The “Heavenly” or “Angel” Language Myth

Many modern tongues are claimed to be heavenly languages or angelic speech beyond human understanding. This idea has no biblical foundation. The tongues in Acts 2 were actual languages of earth, not mystical, gibberish speech.

Paul mentions the possibility of “tongues of angels” (1 Cor 13:1) but never instructs believers to speak this way or uses it as a norm or test of spirituality. The Corinthians’ experience with tongues was actual languages or unknown human languages, not angelic babbling.

2. Speaking Tongues as a Mandatory Proof of Spirit Baptism

Many Charismatic and Pentecostal churches teach that speaking in tongues is a sign of baptism in the Holy Spirit or even necessary for salvation. The Bible nowhere supports this doctrine. Numerous believers in the New Testament received the Spirit without speaking in tongues (Acts 10:44-48; Acts 19:1-7).

This teaching pressures believers to produce tongues, often leading to counterfeit manifestations.

3. Private Edification Misapplied as Public Worship

Paul states that tongues can edify the individual but insists that public worship be orderly and understandable (1 Cor 14:4-5, 26-28). Modern practices often glorify loud, repetitive, unintelligible tongues in public services with no interpretation, violating biblical instructions.

4. Emotionalism and Peer Pressure

Many who speak in tongues today do so because of strong emotional experiences, desire for acceptance, or group pressure rather than genuine divine gifting. Glossolalia is well-documented in psychological studies as a learned behavior or an altered state of consciousness without supernatural origin.

5. Lack of Interpretation

Biblical tongues require interpretation in public settings to edify the church (1 Cor 14:27-28). Modern churches often tolerate or promote uninterpreted tongues, causing confusion and disorder contrary to Scripture.


The Spiritual Danger of Accepting False Tongues

  • Deception by False Spirits1 John 4:1 commands believers to test the spirits. False tongues can be demonic or counterfeit spiritual manifestations aimed at deceiving and dividing the church.

  • Distracts from True Gospel and RepentanceAn overemphasis on tongues can mislead believers into focusing on emotional experiences rather than genuine faith, repentance, obedience, and the fruit of the Spirit.

  • Creates Spiritual ElitismClaiming tongues as proof of superior spirituality fosters pride, division, and false assurance.


What Is the Biblical Alternative?

True spiritual power is demonstrated not by ecstatic utterances, but by the fruit of the Spirit and godly living (Galatians 5:22-23). Other gifts like prophecy, teaching, wisdom, and healing build up the body in clear, orderly ways.

Believers are called to pursue love, faith, holiness, and humility rather than sensational experiences.


Conclusion: Test All Things and Hold to the Word

The modern practice of speaking in tongues often contradicts the biblical pattern and teachings. It is frequently a counterfeit manifestation born of emotionalism and deception. The genuine gift of tongues was a purposeful sign for early unbelievers, involving real languages and church edification through interpretation.

We must heed Paul’s admonitions for orderly worship and test all spirits by Scripture:

“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God…” — 1 John 4:1
“God is not a God of confusion but of peace.” — 1 Corinthians 14:33

True spiritual empowerment comes through faith in Jesus Christ, obedience to God’s Word, and the inner transformation by the Holy Spirit that produces godly character—not by unintelligible babbling or emotionalism.

©
Donate with PayPal

✊ Help Share the Truth
Support our work in restoring the legacy of the true Israelites.

💳 Donate via PayPal
📬 unxturner@gmail.com

We deeply appreciate your support.

  • Hebrew Israelite children's books

  • Biblical children's books

  • black children's books

  • African american children's books

Copyright 2019 Soamibooks

bottom of page